Evaluation of genetic diversity in sugar beet (Sugar beet L.) hybrids in terms of yield, qualitative and germination traits

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Plant breeding Ph. D. student, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.

2 Researcher of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI) - Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Sugar Beet Seed Institute (SBSI)- Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The study of phenotypic diversity is highly recommended as a first step before conducting in-depth biochemical or molecular studies. Hence, morphological description is the most important issue in the process of studying and preserving plant genetic diversity. The use of different traits to study phenotypic diversity reveals the genetic structure and degree of diversity of the study population, which forms the basis of genetic breeding. In breeding programs with the aim of improving the crop and increasing productivity, recognizing the genetic diversity associated with important agronomic traits and also determining the relationship between them is of particular importance.
Materials and Methods: In this regard, 155 sugar beet hybrids were planted in five incomplete blocks in Khoy Agricultural Research Station during 2020 in the augmented randomized complete block design with five controls of Sina, Novodoro, Modex, Lorquite and Pirula. Germination uniformity and growth uniformity were recorded during the growing season. Experimental harvesting operation was performed by counting and weighing the roots of experimental plots. The roots were then transferred to the sugar technology laboratory of Khoy Agricultural Research Station to wash and prepare a random sample of pulp. To estimate sugar yield, first the root yield of each hybrid was generalized per ton per hectare and by multiplying the percentage of sugar and root yield, sugar yield was obtained. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental variances, phenotypic, genetic and environmental variation coefficients, general heritability and genetic advance were calculated. After calculating Pearson correlation coefficients between the studied traits, stepwise regression analysis was performed for sugar yield characteristics; Then, according to the traits entered in the regression equation, path analysis for sugar yield was performed. Experimental genotypes were grouped based on the Ward method and the optimal number of clusters was determined based on k means.
Results and Discussion: The results of analysis of variance of the studied traits indicated that there was significant genetic diversity among experimental hybrids in terms of germination uniformity, root yield, sugar content and sugar yield. In all studied traits, due to the influence of environmental factors on them, the phenotypic diversity coefficient was estimated to be higher than the genetic diversity coefficient. Four traits of germination uniformity, root yield, sugar yield and sugar content showed high inheritance. Among the different studied traits, sugar yield and root yield had a positive and a very significant correlation at the probability level of 0.1%. The results of stepwise regression analysis confirmed that the three traits of root yield, sugar content and germination uniformity cause more than 99% change in sugar yield. The results of path analysis confirmed the results of correlation analysis and stepwise regression and showed that the most direct and positive effect is related to the root yield. Based on cluster analysis, experimental hybrids were classified into four distinct groups; So that in the first group was hybrids that had high uniformity in germination and good yield in terms of roots and sugar.
Conclusion: Genetic diversity is now accepted as a special field that can contribute to food security and nutrition. Genetic diversity of crops is the basis of sustainable development. Therefore, there is a need to identify diverse genetic resources using various statistical tools and use them in breeding programs. In the present study, genetic diversity in terms of different traits among sugar beet hybrids was investigated using statistical methods. The results showed that there was considerable genetic diversity among the experimental hybrids in terms of the majority of traits, which confirms the extensive genetic variation in breeding hybrids and provided the paternal basis of this rich diversity in the studied germplasm; Experimental hybrids were divided into four heterotic groups for all traits. Given the diversity of traits and experimental hybrids, hybrids with desirable traits can be selected based on breeding goals and used in future breeding programs to achieve the goals.

Keywords


Allard, R. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. Publishers by John Wiley and Sons. Inc New York:485.
Anonymous. 1999. Agribusiness Handbooks, Sugar Beets/ White Sugar, vol 4.
Biancardi, E., McGrath, J.M., Panella, L.W., Lewellen, R.T., and Stevanato, P. 2010. Sugar beet. In: Root and tuber crops. Springer, pp 173-219.
Burton, G.W., and Devane, D.E. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festucaarundinacea) from replicated clonal material 1. Agronomy Journal, 45(10), 478-481.
Comstock, R., and Robinson, H. 1952. Genetic parameters, their estimation and significance. In: Proceedings of the 6th international Grassland congress. pp 248-291.
Dohm, J.C., Minoche, A.E., Holtgräwe, D., Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Zakrzewski, F., Tafer, H., Rupp, O., Sörensen, T.R., Stracke, R., Reinhardt, R., Goesmann, A., Kraft, T., Schulz, B., Stadler, P.F., Schmidt, T., Gabaldón, T., Lehrach, H., Weisshaar, B., and Himmelbauer, H. 2014. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature, 505(7484), 546-549. doi:10.1038/nature12817
Falconer, D.S. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Pearson Education India.
Crops production and area harvested. 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
Fotouhi, K., Majidi, E., Rajabi, A., and Azizinejad, R. 2017. Study of genetic variation for drought tolerance in sugar beet half-sib families. Journal of Sugar Beet, 33(1),16-11.
Gratani, L. 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Advances in botany, 2014(1), 1-17.
Hoogendijk, M., and Williams, D.E. 2002. Characterizing the genetic diversity of home garden crops: some examples from the Americas. Home gardens and in situ conservation of plant genetic resourcesin farming systems, 34(1), 1-10.
Huang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Xie, W., Jiang, X., Peng, F., Yan, Y., Ma, X., and Liu, W. 2014. Genetic stability and DNA fingerprinting of the Hemarthria compressa cultivar “Guangyi”. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 55(1),  310-316.
Hughes, A.R., Inouye, B.D., Johnson, M.T., Underwood, N., and Vellend, M. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology letters, 11(6), 609-623.
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H., and Comstock, R. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmentalvariability in soybeans 1. Agronomy journal, 47(7), 314-318.
Kiani, J.K., Bihamta, M., Habibi, D., Aaghsrzadeh, A., and Saremirad, A. 2020. Effect of mycorrhizal fungus application on some biochemical characters of wheat cultivars in lead contaminated soil. Journal of Water and Soil, 34(2), 393-408.
Kunz, M., Martin, D., and Puke, H. 2002. Precision of beet analyses in Germany explained for polarization. Zuckerindustrie, 127(1), 13-21.
Liang, S., Rong, X., Sai, L., Chen, J., Changqing, X., Caixiang, X., and Tongning, L. 2015. Phenotypic variation of seed traits of Haloxylon ammodendron and its affecting factors. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 60(1), 81-87.
Monteiro, F., Frese, L., Castro, S., Duarte, M.C., Paulo, O.S., Loureiro, J., and Romeiras, M.M. 2018. Genetic and genomic tools to asssist sugar beet improvement: the value of the crop wild relatives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9:74-85.
Moosavi, S.G.R., Ramazani, S.H.R., Hemayati, S.S., and Gholizade, H. 2017. Effect of drought stress on root yield andsome morpho-physiological traits in different genotypes of sugar beet (Beta Vulgaris L.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 20(3), 167-174.
Nasri, R., Kashani, A., Paknejad, F., Sadeghi Shoae, M., and Ghorbani, S. 2012. Correlation and path analysis of qualitative and quantitative yield in sugar beet in transplant and direct cultivation method in saline lands. Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 8(1), 213-226.
Podgornik, M., Vuk, I., Vrhovnik, I., and Mavsar, D.B. 2010. A survey and morphological evaluationof fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia. Scientia Horticulturae, 125(3), 380-389.
Price, T.D., Qvarnström, A., and Irwin, D.E. 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of LondonSeries B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523), 1433-1440.
Ribeiro, I.C., Pinheiro, C., Ribeiro, C.M., Veloso, M.M., Simoes-Costa, M.C., Evaristo, I., Paulo, O.S., and Ricardo, C.P. 2016. Genetic diversity and physiological performance of Portuguese wild beet (Beta vulgaris spp. maritima) from three contrasting habitats. Frontiers in plant science, 7(1), 1293.
Saremirad, A., Bihamta, M., Malihipour, A., Mostafai, K., and Alipour, H. 2021a. Association mapping of bread wheat genotypes resistance to stem rust. Islamic Azad University of Karaj Branch, Alborz, Karaj, Iran.
Saremirad, A., Bihamta, M.R., Malihipour, A., Mostafavi, K., and Alipour, H. 2020. Evaluation of resistance of some Iranian spring bread wheat cultivars to stem rust disease at seedling stage. Seedand Plant Journal, 36(4),383-401. doi:10.22092/sppi.2021.123891.
Saremirad, A., Mostafai, K., and Hosseini, M.S. 2021b. Evaluation of tolerance to terminal drought stress in sunflower genotypes (Hellianthusannuus L.). Plant Production Technology, 12(2),1-18.
Saremirad, A., and Mostafavi, K. 2020. Genetic diversity study of sunflower (Helianthusannus L.) genotypes for agro-morphological traits under normal and drought stress conditions. Plant Productions, 43(2),227-240. doi:10.22055/ppd.2020.27588.1671
Saremirad, A., Taleb, M.H., Omrani, S., and Mostafavi, K. 2018. Genetic variation study for agro-morphological traits in safflower genotypes (Carthamus tinctorius L.).  14(3),23-32.
Singh, A., and Chaudhary, R. 1996. Dithizone and thiosemicarbazide as inhibitors of corrosion of type 304 stainless steel in 1· 0M sulphuric acid solution. British Corrosion Journal, 31(4),300-304.
Singh, S., and Pawar, I.S. 2005. Theory and application of biometrical genetics. CBS Publishers & Distributors.
Sun, Y., Liang, J., Ye, J., and Zhu, W. 1999. Cultivation of super-high yielding rice plants. China Rice, 5:38-39.
Thomas, H., Ougham, H.J., Wagstaff, C., and Stead, A.D. 2003. Defining senescence and death. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(385),1127-1132.
Via, S., Gomulkiewicz, R., De Jong, G., Scheiner, S.M., Schlichting, C.D., and Van Tienderen, P.H. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology &Evolution, 10(5),212-217.
Via, S., and Lande, R. 1987. Evolution of genetic variability in aspatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype–environment interaction. Genetics Research, 49(2),147-156.
Wang, B., Zhang, J., Yang, X., and Jiang, Z. 2009. Relationship of seed characters and seedling growth traits of Haloxylon ammodendron fromdifferent provenances with geographical and climatic factors. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 18(1),28-35.
Yin, X., Goudriaan, J., Lantinga, E.A., Vos, J., and Spiertz, H.J. 2003. A flexible sigmoid function of determinate growth. Annals of botany, 91(3),361-371.