Effect of drought Stresses and aerosols on yield and some physiological traits of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D student of Agronomy, Department of Agriculture, Khorramabad branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.

2 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran.

3 Seed and Plant Improvement Institude, AREEO, Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction
Abiotic stresses, in particular, water shortage pose immense challenges to crop production and can decrease crop yields by 50% worldwide (Mahajan Tuteja, 2005). Water deficit has negative impacts on growth, development and production of legumes, which may result in decreased chlorophyll a and b and increased proline content of leaf (Karimi et al., 2016). Aerosols are principal air pollutants that can greatly impact human health and plant development. This natural phenomenon, which mainly occurs in Iraq and Iran`s western regions, has exacerbated in recent years and caused a lot of damage (Marsafari, 2011). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of aerosol particles and drought stress on grain sorghum photosynthetic pigments, soluble sugars, proline, relative water content of flag leaf, leaf temperature and grain yield.
Materials and Methods
The research was conducted to investigate the effect of drought and aerosol stresses on morpho-physiological traits of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.) at Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center in 2015. A split plot design based on RCBD was used with four replications. The main plots were allocated to four different irrigation regimes: watering after 60, 90 and 120 mm evaporation from pan class A. The subplots were assigned to three levels of aerosols derived from clay soil source) control treatment, 50 and 100 mg m-3 aerosol particles (. Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, soluble sugars, proline content, relative water content and leaf temperature were measured at flowering period and yield components and grain yield were measured at harvest time.
Results and Discussion
The results of the first year of the experiment showed that chlorophylls a and b were only affected by drought stress where they were linearly significantly decreased from 0.017 and 0.012 mg/g FW, respectively, in control treatment, to 0.0068 and 0.0065 mg/g FW in I120 treatment with increasing drought stress. Water stress triggered the production of active oxygen along with the reduction and decomposition of chlorophyll (Karimi et al., 2016).
Soluble sugars and proline leaf concentration were not affected by aerosols, but were significantly affected by drought stress. Sugar content linearly and significantly increased from 4.3 mg/g under normal moisture conditions to 7.9 mg/g fresh leaf weight in I120 treatment. Proline concentrations were linearly and significantly increased from 0.25 mg/g under normal moisture conditions to 0.66 mg / g leaf fresh weight in I120 treatment.
The results of two-year compound variance analysis indicated that grain number per panicle decreased but thousand grain weight increased due to drought stress. The change in grain yield was attributed to significant linear relationship and negative correlations with increasing drought stress. The highest average grain yield (8257 kg/ha) was obtained from the normal irrigation, which decreased to 6393 kg/ha under drought stress. The highest average relative content of flag leaf water was obtained from the normal irrigation, which was 2.80% and was reduced to 70.3% under drought stress.
Conclusion
In general, it was found that the amount of chlorophylls a and b and the relative water content of flag leaf and, as a result, grain yield were significantly decreased with increasing drought stress, but osmotic compounds (sugars solution and proline content of leaf) and leaf temperature increased significantly. Increasing drought stress decreased the number of grains per panicle and increased 1000-grain weight, but the increase in 1000-grain weight could not compensate for the decrease in the number of grains per panicle and consequently led to the decreased grain yield. Low concentration of aerosols on the sorghum leaves due to being vertical and waxy caused no serious damage to the plant's photosynthetic system and as a consequence to grain production.

Keywords


Alfi, S.H., and Azizi, F. 2015. Effect of drought stress and using zeolite on some quantitative and quaitative traits of three maize varieties. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 4(2): 1-7.
Ahmed, A. A. 2012. Effectiveness of screening and hardening methods for drought resistance in sorghum genotypes (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) evaluated under arid conditions. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Gezira.
Alikhani, M. A., Etemadi, F., and Ajirlo, A. F. 2012. Physiology basis of yield difference in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in a semi-arid environment. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7(7): 488-496.
Amal, GA., Bekheta, M.A., Orabi, S.A. 2010. Influence of arginine on growth and productivity of two sorghum cultivars grown under water shortage. International Journal of Academic Research, 2:72-80.
Amini, Z., and Haddad, R. 2013. Role of photosynthetic pigments and antioxidant enzymes against oxidative stress. Journal of cellular and molecular researches (Iranian journal of biology). 26(3): 251-265.
Amjad Ali, M., Abbas, A., Niaz, S., Zulkiffal, M., and Ali, S. 2009. Morphophysiological criteria for drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at seedling and post-anthesis Ssages. International Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 11: 674-680.
Anonymous. 2015. FAO Data Based [online]. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org.
Anonymous. 2016. Available at: http://www.lorestandoe.ir/news.html.
Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Phisiology, 24: 1-15.
Assefa, Y., and Staggenborg, S.A. 2010. Grain sorghum yield with hybrid advancement and change in agronomic practices from 1957 through 2008. Agronomy Journal, 102, 703-706.
Assefa, Y., Staggenborg, S.A., and Prasad, V.P.V. 2010. Grain sorghum water requirement and responses to drought stress: A review. Online. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2010-1109-01-RV.
Bahramichegeni, Z., Amiri, H., and LariYazdi, H. 2013. Effect of drought stress on some physiological parameters of basil. Agricultural Science and Technology, 419-430 (In Persian with English Summary).
Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P., and Teare, I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.
Belayet, H.M., Rahman, W., Rahman, M.N., Noorul Anwar, A.H.M., and Hossen, A.K.M.M. 2010. Effects of water stress on yield attributes and yield of different mungbean genotypes. African Journal of Biochemistry Research, 5:19-24.
Boyer, J., and Westgate, M. 2004. Grain yields with limited water. Journal of Exp. Botany, 55:2385–2394.
Chameides, W.L. 1999. Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: An opportunity to enhance crop yields in China through emission controls? Proceeding of the national Academy of Science of the United State of America, 96, 13, 326-13, 633.
Chaturvedi, V., Hejazi, M.I., Edmonds, J.A., Clarke, L.E., Kyle, G.P., Davies, E., Wise, M.A., and Calvin, K.V. 2013. Climate policy implications for agricultural water demand. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Technical Report PNNL- 22356. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA.
Cha-um, S., and Kirdmanee, CH. 2009. Proline accumulation, photosynthetic abilities and growth characters of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plantlets in response to iso-osmotic salt and water-deficit stress. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8(1): 51-58.
Chaves, M.M., Pereira, J.S., Maroco, J., Rodrigues, M.L., Ricardo, C.P.P., Osorio, M.L., Carvalho, I., Faria, T. and Pinheiro, C. 2002. How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Journal of Annals Botany, 89: 907-916.
Cornic, G., and Briantais, J.M. 1991. Partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 and O2 reduction in a C3 leaf (Phasiolus vulgaris L. ) at different CO2 concentration and during water sue. Planta, 183: 178-184.
Ehdaie, B., Alloush, G.A.,  Madore, M.A., and Waines, J.G. 2006. Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat: I. postanthesis changes in internode dry matter. Journal of Crop Science, 46: 735- 746.
El Naim A.M., Baldu, M.A.M., and Zaied, M.M.B. 2012. Effect of tillage depth and pattern on growth and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under rain-fed. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 1(3): 68-73.
Efeoglu, B., Ekmekci, Y., and Cichek N. 2009. Physiolocal responces of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African Journal of Botany. 75:34–42
Fateminejhad, P., Lary-Yazdy, H. and Rafee, M. 2017. Effect of aerosols and drought stresses on some physiological traits of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Applied Research in Field Crops, 30(2): 19-30.
Ghorbanli, M., and Niakan, M. 2006. The effect of drought stress on soluble sugar, total protein, proline, phenolic compound, chlorophyll content and rate reductase activity in soybean (Glycine max L.cv.Gorgan3). Materials and Energy, 18(56): 537-550 (In Persian with English Summary).
Giovanni, P., Jonghan, K., Marek, T., and Howell, T. 2009. Determination of growth-stagespecific crop coefficients (KC) of maize and sorghum. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1698–1704.
Harmut, K. L., and Babani, F. 2000. Detection of photosynthetic activity and water stress by imaging the red chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 38: 889-895.
Jabereldar, A.A., El Naim, A.M., Abdalla, A.A., and Dagash, Y.M. 2017. Effect of Water Stress on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in Semi-Arid Environment. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 7(1): 1-6.
Karimi, R., Hadi, H., and Tajbakhsh Shishavan, M. 2016. Exploring the possibility of reducing deficit water stress damage on yield of forage sorghum by foliar application of salicylic acid and zinc sulphate. Agricultural crop management (Journal of Agriculture), 18(2): 507-520 (In Persian with English Summary).
Kazemi Arbat, H. 2005. Morphology and anatomy of cereal crops. 2nd volume. Tabriz University Press. 588p.
Khalilzadeh, R., Seyed Sharifi, R., and Jalilian, J. 2016. Antioxidant status and physiological responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to cycocel application and bio fertilizers under water limitation condition. Journal of plant interactions, 11(2) 130–137.
Kochert, G. 1978. Carbohydrate determination by the phenol sulfuric acid method. In: Helebust, Journal of Agricultural Craig, J.S.(ed): Hand book of Physiological Method, 56-97, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kumudini, S., Hume, D. J. and Chu, G. 2002. Genetic improvement in short-season soybeans: II. Nitrogen accumulation, remobilization, and partitioning. Crop Science, 42: 141-145.
Lak, S., Naderi, A., Siadat, S.A., Aynehband, A., and Noormohammadi, GH., 2007. Effects of water deficiency stress on yield and nitrogen efficiency of grain corn hybrid KSC 704 at different nitrogen rates and plant population. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science of Natural Resources, 14(2), 63- 76. [In Persian with English Summary].
Li, Q., Wang-Li, L., Jayanty, R.K.M., and Shah, S.B. 2013. Organic and elemental carbon in atmospheric fine particulate matter in an animal agriculture intensive area in north Carolina: Estimation of secondary organic carbon concentrations. Open Journal of Air Pollution, 2: 7-18.
Mahajan, S., and Tuteja, N. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 444, 139-158.
Marsafari, M., Asoudar, M.A., and Kordi, S. 2011. Aerosol resources and adjust their harm effects. Second national conference on critical management. Tehran. Iran. doi: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-NCEVSLL02-NCEVSLL02_388 (In Persian).
Martin, M.F., Miceli, J., Morgan, A., Scalet, M., and Zerbi, G. 1993. Synthesis of osmotically active substrates in winter wheat leaves as related to drought resistance of different genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Crop Science, 171: 176-184.
Mazaherilaghab, H., Nori, F., Zare- Abyane, H., and Vafaei, H. 2001. Effect of final irrigation on important traits of three varieties of sunflower in dry land farming. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1: 41-44 (in Persian).
Menezes, C.B., Saldanha, D.C., Santos, C.V., Andrade, L.C., Mingote Júlio, M.P., Portugal, A.F. and Tardin, F.D. 2015. Evaluation of grain yield in sorghum hybrids under water stress. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14(4): 12675-12683.
Meywerk, J., and Ramanathan, V. 2002. Influence of anthropogenic aerosols on the total and spectral irradiance on the sea surface during INDOEX, Journal of Geophysics Research Atmospheres, 107, D19, 8018, doi: 10.1029/2000JD000022,2002.17-1to17-14,1999.
Moosavi, S.G., Seghatoleslami, M.J., Javadi, H. and Ansari-nia, E. 2011. Effect of irrigation intervals and planting patterns on yield and qualitative traits of forage Sorghum. Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(10): 3363-3368.
Moseki, B., and Dintwe, K. 2011. Effect of  water stress on photosynthetic characteristics of two sorghum cultivars. Australian Journal Biotechnology, 5(Special Issue 1): 89-91.
Mozafari, K., Arshi, Y., and Zynali – Khanegha, H. 1996. Effect of drought stress on some morphological traits and yield componenets of sunflower. Seed and Plant, 12(4): 24-32 (in Persian).
Naresh, R.K., Purushottam, S.P., Dwivedi, A., and Kumar, V. 2013. Effects of water stress on physiological processes and yield attributes of different mungbean (L.) varieties. African Journal of Biochemistry Researc, 7(5): 55-62.
Narshima Rao, C.L., and Shivraj, A. 1998. Effect of water stress on grain growth of glossy and non glossy varieties of grain sorghum. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 58: 770-773.
Parida, A.K., and Das, A.B. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 60: 324-349.
Rafiee, M. 2012. Effect of every other furrow irrigation and planting density on physiological traits in corn. World Applied Science Journal, 17(2): 189-193.
Rafiee, M. 2014. Corn: proceeding. 1st Ed. Sarva Press. 244 p. Iran (In Persian).
Rafiee, M., Kalhor, M. 2015. Economic water use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids as Affected by Irrigation Regimes: A Case Study in West Iran. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2015.1105360
Sanchez, F.J., De Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L., and Ayerbe, L. 2003. Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water stress. Field Crop Research, 86: 81-90.
Sanchez, F.J., Manzanares, M., De Andres, E.F., Tenorio, J.L., and Ayerbe, L. 1998. Turgor maintenance, osmotic adjustment and soluble sugar and prolin Baccumulation in 49 pea cultivars in response to water stress. Field Crop Research, 59: 225-235.
Sarvari, S. M., and Beheshti, S. A. 2012. Relationship between grain yield and plant characteristics in grain sorghum genotypes in the normal and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 14(2):183-201. (In Persian)
Shomaili, M. 2012. Aerosols, Resources and their effects on crops. A case study: sugarcane farms in south Khoozestan province. Second national conference on critical management. Tehran. Iran. doi: http://www.civilica.com/Paper-NCEVSLL02-NCEVSLL02_388 (In Persian).
Siddique, M.R.B., Hamid A., and Islam, M.S. 2007. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Botanical Bulltan of Academic Science, 41:35-39.
Stone, L. R., and Schlegel, A.J. 2006. Yield-water supply relationship of grain sorghum and winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 98:1359-1366.
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., and Altman, A. 2001. Biotechnology of plant osmotic stress tolerance: physiological and molecular considerations. Acta Horticulturae, 560:285-292.
Zandalinas, S.I., Mittler, R., Balfagón, D., Arbona, V., and Gómez-Cadenas, A. 2018. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiology of Plant, 162, 2–12. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12540