Evaluation of the effects of different irrigation regimes on remobilization of dry matter and grain yield of rice in northern Khuzestan

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D Agronomy. Young Researchers and Elite Club, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran.

2 faculty of agronomy department of Payame noor university,Iran

3 Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

4 Professor., University of Agricultural and Natural Resources of Ramin, Ahwaz, Iran

5 Assistant Professor of Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Khozestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran

6 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Rice can be irrigated like wheat and corn as an aerobic plant (1 and 3). Studies show that at certain stages of plant development, materials development, production photosynthetic processes are surplus to requirements. This material is for Ghyrsakhtmany compounds in plant vegetative organs such as stems, pods and leaves are stored and to pursue the establishment of a strong physiological destinations, during remobilization to the grain moves (2). Potential remobilization is a physiologically acceptable index to a variety of factors including genotype and lack of water or too dependent (4). With regard to water crisis, it’s essential to increase knowledge level and awareness about water tension loss. This study aims at realization of this purpose and reducing the negative effects of water tension.
Materials and methods: An experiment Was carried out Study of irrigation regimes on rice genotypes remobilization and grain yield of Khuzestan province in a split-plot arrangement using randomized comlete bloks design with three replication in 2014 and 2015 cropping seasons at Shavoor Agricultural Research Station, Dependent in Research Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources of Khuzestan. For exposing rice genotypes to Four different irrigation regimes (1, 3, 5 and 7 days), and 12 genotypes were randomized in sub-plots.
Results and Discussion: The combined analysis results showed that all of these attributes among different irrigation regimes, genotype and interaction of two factors have significant difference, at the level of five percent and in property remobilization efficiency, between the irrigation regimes and this story was true for other levels and the qualities at one percent level. And only in the interaction of two factors of irrigation regime and total genotype distribution, no statistically significant difference was observed. The amount of remobilization, apart from the leave that saw decrease from Flood irrigation regime to 3-day period, in the other organs saw increase and then by increasing the number of decreasing irrigation intervals, according to the dry matter of organs. Regarding the efficiency of remobilization, apart from the leave that experienced a decreasing trend from flood irrigation regime to 5-day irrigation period, and then in 7-day irrigation period it experienced an increasing trend, while stem experienced a totally an inverse trend. The share of Leaves in redistribution share of three-day irrigation frequency decreased and then increased with increasing and decreasing irrigation, in a way that inverse share of stem and total had the largest share under the condition of increased drought around the plant by seven- day irrigation period. And the ability and difference of leave source could be the reason for its being different from the other organs. Probably due to low tank volume and reduced ability to produce the active tank, the main factor is reducing the amount of supply, efficiency and contribution of remobilization in irrigation regimes. Correlation coefficients show that grain yield with greatest average of 6555.10 kg per hectare in second irrigation regime with three-day irrigation period in the genotype IR 81025-B-327-3. Biggest significant and positive correlation was with panicle redistribution (0.207**), stem (0.136*) and total (0.129*) but the other attributes had negative correlation with the grain yield.
Conclusion: According to the results stem maximum value, efficiency and remobilization of dry matter in the main sink plant, The genotypes with greater resistance and frequency of irrigation regimes with one, three and five days filling an important role in providing seed, and this could be one of the reasons for the superior yield of these genotypes is under irrigation.

Keywords


Abdola, A.A., and Zarea, M.J. 2015. Effect of Mycorrhiza and Root Endophytic Fungi under Flooded and Semi-Flooded Conditions on Grain Yield and Yield Components of Rice. Crop Production, 8 (1): 223-230. (in Persian with English abstract).
Carmelita, M., Albertoa, R., Wassmanna, R., Hiranob, T., Miyatac, A., Hatanob, R., Kumara, A., Padrea, A., and Amante, M. 2011. Comparisons of energy balance and evapotranspiration between flooded and aerobic rice fields in the Philippines. Agricultural Water Management, (98): 1417–1430.
Chogan, R. 2004. Corn breeding for drought tolerance and nitrogen from theory to practice (Translation). Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture, P: 96.
Dong, N.M., Brandt, K.K., Sørensen, J., Hung, N.N., Hach, C.V., Tan, P.S., and Dalsgaard, T. 2012. Effects of alternating wetting and drying versus continuous flooding on fertilizer nitrogen fate in rice fields in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Soil Biology of Biochemical, 47: 166–174.
Durand, M., Porcheron, B., Hennion, N., Maurousset, L., Lemoine, R., and pourtau, N. 2016. Water deficit enhances C export to the roots in Arabidopsis thaliana plants with contribution of sucrose transporters in both shoot and roots. Plant Physiology, 170 (1): 1460-1479.
Eradatmand asli, D., and Jamasabi, N. 2012. Effect of shading on remobilization of dry matter, yield and yield components of different rice varieties. Plants and ecosystems, 9 (34): 93-105. (in Persian with English abstract).
Ghasemi-Nasr, M., Karandish, F., Naft-Chali, A.D., and Mokhtasa-Bigdali, A. 2016. Effect of two periods of mid-season drainage on growth parameters of two rice varieties. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29 (4): 419-431. (in Persian with English abstract).
Ghosh, B., and Chakma, N. 2015. Impacts of rice intensification system on two C. D. blocks of Barddhaman district, West Bengal. Current Science, 109 (2): 342-346.
Kage, H., M. Kochler and H. Stutzel. 2004. Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress conditions: measurement and simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 20: 379–394.
Kobata, T., Sugawara, S., and M.and-Takatu, S. 2000. Shading during the early grain filling period does not affect potential grain dry matter increase in rice. Agronomic Journal, 92: 411-417.
Lak, S.H., Siadat, S.A., Aenah-Band, A., Nor-Mohamadi, G.H., and Mosavi, S.H. 2006. The effects of irrigation, nitrogen and plant density on yield, yield components and remobilization of assimilates corn pellets in Khuzestan weather conditions. Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 42 (1): 1-14. (in Persian with English abstract).
Limouchi, K., Siadat, S.A., Gilani, A. 2014. Effect of planting date on vegetative growth and yield of three rice cultivars in north regions of Khuzestan. Agronomic Research in Semi Desert Regions, 11(1): 51-63. (in Persian with English abstract).
Madah-Khaksar, A., Nadari, A., Aenah-Band, A., and Lak, S.H. 2013. Interaction of irrigation and water cuts on the redistribution of material storage, current photosynthesis and its relationship to corn yield. Journal of Crop Physiology, 22 (2): 53-68. (in Persian with English abstract).
Mohd-Zain, N.A., and Razi-Ismail, M. 2016. Effects of potassium rates and types on growth, leaf gas exchange andbiochemical changes in rice (Oryza sativa) planted under cyclic water stress. Agricultural Water Management, 164 (1): 83-90. (in Persian with English abstract).
Mosavy, S.A., Khaledian, M.R., Ashrafzadeh, A., and Shahinrokhsar. P. 2016. Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water productivity increasing of three soybean genotypes in Rasht region. Journal of water research agriculture, 29 (4): 433-446. (in Persian with English abstract).
Pandey, A., Kumar, A., Pandey, D.S., and Thongbam, P.D. 2014. Rice quality under water stress. Indian Journal of Advances in Plant Research. 1 (2): 23-26
Park, G.H., Kim, J.H., and Kim, K.M. 2014. QTL analysis of yield components in rice using a cheongcheong/nagdong doubled haploid genetic map. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5: 1174-1180.
Pierre Saint, C., Peterson, C. J., Ross, A. S., Ohm, J. B., Verhoeven, M. C., Larson, M., and Hoefer, B. 2008. Winter wheat genotypes under different levels of nitrogen and water stress: Changes in grain protein composition. Journal of Cereal Sciences, 47 (3): 407-416.
Samonte-SO., P.B., Wilson, L.T., Mcclung, A.M., and Tarpley, L. 2001. Seasonal dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrate partitioning is in divers rice genotypes. Crop Sciences, 41: 902-909.
Sedaghat, N., Pirdashti, H., Asadi, R., and Mousavi-Taghani, Y. 2015. Effect of different irrigation methods on rice water productivity. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 28 (1): 1-9. (in Persian with English abstract).
Sinaki, J.M., Majidi Heravan, E., Shirani Rad, A. H., Noormohamadi, G., and Zarei, G. 2007. The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2: 417-422.
Shanmugasundaram, B. 2015. Adoption of system of rice intensification under farmer participatory action research programme (FPARP). Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 15 (1): 114-117.
Srayloo, M., Sabouri, H., and Dadras, A.R. 2015. Assessing genetic diversity of rice genotypes using microsatellite markers and their relationship with morphological characteristics of seedling stage under non- and drought-stress conditions. Cereal Research Communications, 5 (1): 1-15. (in Persian with English abstract).
Tan, X., Shao, D., Liu, H., Yang, F., Xiao, C., and Yang, H. 2013. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on percolation and nitrogen leaching in paddy fields. Paddy Water Environment, 11: 1–15.
Tarlera, S., Capurro, M.C., Irisarri, P., Scavino, A.F., Cantou, G., and Roel, C. 2015. Yield-scaled global warming potential of two irrigation management systems in a highly productive rice system. Scientia Agricola, 73 (1): 43-50.
Tavala, R., Aalami, A., Sabouri, H., and sabouri, A. 2015. Evaluation of haplotype and allelic diversity of SSR markers linked to major effect QTL on chromosome 9 controlling drought tolerance in rice. Cereal Research, 5 (1): 107-119.
Tosi, P., Atabaki, A., and Pirzadah, A. 2015. Effect of different nitrogen rates on current photosynthesis and dry matter remobilization of two cultivars of rapeseed. Crop Production and Processing, 17 (3): 97-108.
Tuong, T.P., Bouman, B.A.M., and Mortimer, M. 2005. More rice, less water integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Production Sciences, 8: 231- 41.
Tuyen, D.D., and Prasad, D.T. 2008. Evaluating difference of yield trait among rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.) under low moisture condition using candidate gene markers. Omonrice, 16: 24-33.
Wade, L.J., Mclaren, C. G., Quintana, L., Rajatasereekul, S., Sarawgi, A. K., Kumar, A., Ahmed, H.U., Singh, A.K., Rodriguez, R., Siopongco, J., and Sarkarung, S. 1999. Genotype by environment interactions across divers rainfed lowland rice environments. Field Crops Research, 64: 35-50.
Walton, G., Mendham, N., Robertson, M. and Potter, T. 1999. Phenology, physiology and agronomy of canola in Australia, In: Proceeding of 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, P: 9-14.
Wang, Z., Yang, J., Zhu, Q., zhang, z., lang, Y., and wang, X. 2001. Reasons for poor grain plum pnress in intersubspecifichy hybrid rice. (In Chinese, with English abstract) Acta Agronomica Sinica, 24 (6): 782-787.
Watanabe, Y., Nakamura, Y., and Ishii, R. 1997. Relationship between starch accumulation and activities of the related enzymes in the leaf sheath as temporary sink organ in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Australian Journal of plant physiology, 24: 563-569.