Effect of PGPR inoculation on yield and nutrient uptake of corn (SC. 704)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Growth and nutrient uptake of Corn (SC.704)

Introduction


Maize (Zea mays) is one of the most important crops with high nutritive requirements. Due to the characteristics of its rooting system, maize develops a great deal of interaction with soil microorganisms and as a result, it is greatly influenced by soil microbial communities. Pseudomonas and Bacillus are the most important PGPRs that increase plant growth directly or indirectly via different mechanisms such as production of plant hormones (auxin, cytokinin, and gibberellic acid). This may result in increased plant root mass and root branching, ultimately contributing to the increased rates of nutrient uptake by roots. The inoculation of plants with Pseudomonas fluorescence increases plant growth through the production of growth stimulants such as indole acetic acid (IAA) and cytokinins (Vikram et al., 2007). PGPRs can also indirectly induce plant growth via protecting plants from pathogenic injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PGPR bacteria on growth and nutrient absorption of maize plant.

Materials and Methods

In this experiment, of the 51 bacterial strains extracted from alfalfa rhizosphere, 8 superior isolates of Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Rhizobium (Pf54, Pf12, Pf39, Pf29, Bv1, Bv2, Rm42 and Rm43) were selected based on their growth parameters performance in the previous studies (Besharati et al., 2017). The experiment consisted of twelve treatments: 8 bacterial isolates, a mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescent, Rhizobium and Bacillus isolates, (T9), control without fertilization and inoculation (T10), low-input chemical treatment (50% fertilizer recommendation) (T11) and full application of chemical fertilizer (T12), which were arranged in a complete randomized block design with three replications.
Five maize seeds were sown in pots at 3 cm depth and one week after emergence, the number of plants per pot was reduced to 3. From planting till harvest, the phytotron chamber temperature was maintained at 25-28 ° C, relative humidity was from 50 to 70%, and a period of 12 hours of light 60,000 lux (day) and 12 hours of darkness were used. The measured traits included plant height, plant dry weight, root dry weight, root to shoot ratio, root length and the concentrations of N, P, Fe, Mn and Zn.

Result and Discussion

The results showed that the greatest plant heights of 90.1, 89.9, 89.9 and 89.2 cm were respectively obtained from PF12, BV1, pf54 and T9 treatments. The highest nitrogen uptake occurred with RM43 and mixture of isolates treatments. The most effective treatment was found to be the mixture of all bacterial isolates (T9), which resulted in a 83 % increase in maize plant dry weight relative to control. Martin et al, (1982) reported that inoculation of maize seeds with azotobacter and pseudomonas bacteria respectively increased the plant dry weight by 17 and 21 % as compared to control (Zahir et al, 1998)
The Bacillus treatment increased phosphorus uptake by 3.5 times as compared to the control. PF54 treatment caused the highest Fe concentration in maize shoot. The mean absorption of phosphorus increased when the plant was treated with the mixture of Bacillus, Rhizobium and Pseudomonas (T9), which was 249% of the control. The highest (18.34 mg/kg) and the lowest (13.38 mg/kg) Mn shoot concentrations were respectively related to PF54 and control treatments.


Conclusion
Application of the bacteria strains significantly reduced the plant's need for nitrogen, iron, manganese and zinc elements, where the Bacillus was the most effective PGPR in this respect. The mixture of strains and the use of Rhizobium bacteria (RM42 and RM43) raised phosphorus absorption of maize shoot about 2.5 times of the mean value. All the Pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains used in seed inoculation have the ability to produce siderophore. The highest and lowest zinc concentrations in maize were observed under RM43 and PF540 treatments, respectively. Preparation of inoculum from two strains of Bacillus bacteria, two strains of Rhizobium bacteria and four strains of selected Pseudomonas bacteria and inoculation of maize seed before cultivation with these bacteria and using only one third of the recommended nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers together with the bacterial treatments can compete chemical fertilizers and significantly increase the growth indices and shoot nutrient concentrations in maize as compared to the full application chemical fertilizers alone.

Keywords

References

Alexander, D. B., and D. A. Zuberer, 1991. Use of Chrome Azurol S reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 12: 39-45.
Amara, M.A.T., and M.S.A. Dahdoh, 1997. Effect of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and uptake of nutrients by wheat grown on sandy soils. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 37: 467–484.
Amico, E.D., L. Cavalca and V. Andreoni, 2005. Analysis of rhizobacterial communities in perennial Graminaceae from polluted water. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 52: 153-162.
Antoun, H., and J.W. Kloepper, 2001. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), in: Encyclopedia of Genetics, Brenner, S. and J.H., Miller, eds., Academic Press, N.Y., pp.1477-1480.
Barea, J.M., Pozo, M.J., Azco’n, R., Azco´n-Aguilar, C., 2005. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. Journalo of Experimental Botany. 56, 1761–1778.
Bashan, Y., Harison, S.K., and Whitmoyer, R.E. 1990. Enhanced growth of wheat and soybean plants inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense is not necessarily due to general enhancement of mineral uptake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 56:769 -775.
Baudoin, E., Benizri, E., and Guckert, A., 2002. Impact of growth stage on the bacterial community structure along maize roots, as determined by metabolic and genetic fingerprinting. Applied Soil Ecology.19: 135-145.
Biari A., A. Gholami and H.A. Rahmani, 2008. Growth Promotion and Enhanced Nutrient Uptake of Maize (Zea maysL.) by Application of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Arid Region of Iran. Journal of Biological Science. 8: 1015-1020.
Boller, T. and Mauch, F., 1988. Colorimetric assay for chitinase. Methodes in Enzymology. 161:430–435.
Bouyoucos, G.J., 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal. 43, 434-438.
De Freitas, J.R. 2000. Yield and N assimilation of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var Norstar) inoculated with rhizobacteria. Pedobiologia 44: 97-104.
Donate-Corre, J., Leon-Barrios, M. and Perez-Galdona, R. 2004. Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Chamaecytisus proligerus, a forage tree-shrub legume edemic to Canary Island. Plant and Soil. 266:261-272.
Gaind, S., A.C. Gaur, 1989. Effects of pH on phosphate solubilization by microbes. Current Science. 58: 1208–1211.
Hamidi A. and M. Malakouti, 2007, Effect of PGPRs on plant emerge and establishment on field and some trait in late mature corn hybrids. 2nd conference in ecological agriculture. Iran. Gorgan. 20 October.  (In Persian with English Summary)
Hernandez, A.N., Hernandez, A., and Heydrich, M. 1995. Selection of rhizobacteria for use in maize cultivation. Cultivos Tropicals. 6: 5-8.
Kennedy, N. 2005. Soil bacterial and fungal community structure across a range of unimproved and semi-improved upland grasslands. Microbiological Ecology. 463-473.
Lazarovits, G. and Norwak, J. 1997. Rhizobacteria for Improvement of Plant growth and Establishment. Horticultural Science. 32: 188-192.
Lynch, J.M. 1990. Introduction: some consequences of microbial rhizosphere competence for plant and soil. In: The Rhizosphere J.M. Lynch, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. pp. 1–10.
Martin, P., and Glatzle, A. 1982. Mutual influences of Azospirillum spp. and grass seedlings. In Azospirillum. Genetics, physiology, ecology. Edited by W Klingmüller. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel. pp. 108-120.
Nelson, L.M. 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Prospects for new inoculants. Online. Crop Management:10.1094/CM-2004-0301-05-RV.
Pandey, A., Sharma, E., Palni, L.M.S. 1998. Influence of bacterial inoculation on maize in upland farming systems of the Sikkim Himalaya. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 30: 379–384.
Patten, C.L., and Glick, B.R. 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, aug, 3795-3801.
Rai, M.K. 2006. Hand book of microbial biofertilizers. Food products press, an imprint of the Haworth press, Inc. p.p. 137-182.
Schippers, B., Bakker, A.W., Bakker, P.A.H.M. 1987. Interaction of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 25: 339– 358.
Sperber, J.I. 1985. The incidence of apatite solubilizing organisms in the rhizosphere and soil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 9:778–781.
Starr, M.P., Stdp, H., Truper, H.G., Balows, A., and Schlegel, H.G. 1995. The Prokaryotes, Springer-Verlage.
Tilak, K.V., Rangayanki, N., Manoharachari, C. 2006. Synergistic effects of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria and hizobiumon nodulation and nitrogen fixation by pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Euroupian Journal of Soil Science. 57: 67–71.
Turan, M., Ataoglu, N., Sahin, F. 2006. Evaluation of the capacity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi on different forms of phosphorus in liquid culture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28: 99–108.
Van Overbeek, L.S., Trigalet, A., Elsas, J.D. 2002. The viable but non-culturable state in Ralstonia solanacearum- is there a realistic threat to our strategic concepts? In: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. APS Press, The American Phytopathological society. p.103-119.
Vandepitte, J. 1996. Guidelines for antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Alexandria, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean.
Vikram, A., Hamzehzarghani, H., Al-Mughrabi, K.I., Krishnaraj, P.U., Jagadeesh, K.S. 2007. Interaction between Pseudomonas fluorescens FPD-15 and Bradyrhizobium spp. peanut. Biotechnology. 6: 292–298.
Wang, K.L., H., Yoshida, C. Lurin, and J.R. Ecker, 2004. Regulation of ethylene gas biosynthesis by the Arabidopsis ETO1 protein, Nature. 428:945–950.
Weller, D.M. 1983. Colonization of wheat roots by a fluorescent pseudomonad suppressive to take all. Phytopatholgy 73:1548-1553.
Wu, S.C., Cao, Z.H., Li, Z.G., Cheung, K.C., and Wong, M.H. 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial, Geoderma. 125:155-166.
Zahir, A.Z., Arshad, M., and Khalid, A. 1998. Improving maize yield by inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Pakistan Journal of Soil Science. 15:7-11.
Applied Field Crops Research
Volume 31, Issue 3 - Serial Number 120
papers
October 2018
Pages 62-74

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics